Author Topic: Rules  (Read 2656 times)

Offline mario on: November 22, 2012, 03:59:38 PM

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
  • Likes: 2
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Awards
I think the rules should be ungraded on the forum rules.

Here what i think you should add.

1. No spam
2. No religion talk
3. No advertisements
4. Don't post something less than 10 words.
5. No sexual contents in you're banners and in you're profile pictures.
6. Coarse language will not be accepted on the forums.
7. We reserve the right to remove offensive posts without notice.
8. Each member is allowed one login account. Registering with multiple accounts is not allowed.
9. Multiple or repeated posting in order to increase your post count is not allowed.
10. While debating and discussion is fine, we will not tolerate rudeness, profanity (or attempts to bypass profanity filters), insulting posts, personal attacks or purposeless inflammatory posts. Our decision is final in these matters.

I think some of these rules should be added.

Thank you!

-Mario

Offline Gunther #1 on: November 22, 2012, 05:17:22 PM

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
  • Likes: 4
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Hm, I like it.
"The forum Ten Commandments"


--oh crap religious-talk..--
Now you see me...now you don't...headshot

Offline Rotacak #2 on: November 22, 2012, 05:19:15 PM

  • Administrator
  • Hero
  • *
  • Posts: 723
  • Likes: 14
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Awards
If something is not denied by rules, it is not mean that it is allowed. You still can behave good with our rules, but bad with you country law.

1. Already in rules.
2. Why?
3. If your advertisment is not a spam and it is on topic, why not?
4. In this case you cannot answer question with simple "yes" etc.
5. Already in rules.
6. Not sure about this.
7. We have that rights already.
8. You cannot detect and deny it, so this rule is pointless.
9. Already in rules (spam).
10. Rule like this is based on that someone (we), have to guard users from other bad users. But best solution is when good user will ignore bad user. But of course, if bad asocial user appear here, then he can be banned, even without that rule.

Offline Gunther #3 on: November 22, 2012, 05:22:24 PM

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
  • Likes: 4
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Awards
I think he means: People that sign up for the sole purpose of selling us crap.
Now you see me...now you don't...headshot

Offline Rotacak #4 on: November 22, 2012, 05:25:49 PM

  • Administrator
  • Hero
  • *
  • Posts: 723
  • Likes: 14
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Awards
I think he means: People that sign up for the sole purpose of selling us crap.
That is spam.

But if you will say "There is game Natural Selection 2 link, what do you think about that?" Or "I using this video capture program link, for taking screens from games." then it is ok.

Offline mario #5 on: November 22, 2012, 08:49:41 PM

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
  • Likes: 2
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Awards
If something is not denied by rules, it is not mean that it is allowed. You still can behave good with our rules, but bad with you country law.

1. Already in rules.
2. Why?
3. If your advertisment is not a spam and it is on topic, why not?
4. In this case you cannot answer question with simple "yes" etc.
5. Already in rules.
6. Not sure about this.
7. We have that rights already.
8. You cannot detect and deny it, so this rule is pointless.
9. Already in rules (spam).
10. Rule like this is based on that someone (we), have to guard users from other bad users. But best solution is when good user will ignore bad user. But of course, if bad asocial user appear here, then he can be banned, even without that rule.
Religion talk should be a big 'No, no'. A lot of people may not have the same beliefs about another religion, this can cause fights. So i recommend adding that. I remember it happend a lot on my older forums.

:)

Offline Loki #6 on: November 22, 2012, 09:15:13 PM

  • Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 707
  • Likes: 3
  • Gender: Male
  • Awards
    2
    4
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Rotacak had older forums also and if it would happen to him then he would set such rule I guess :p

Offline mario #7 on: November 22, 2012, 09:18:34 PM

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
  • Likes: 2
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Awards
Rotacak had older forums also and if it would happen to him then he would set such rule I guess :p
I don't think something like this would happen but this is just a suggestion for future notice.

Offline Gunther #8 on: November 23, 2012, 05:16:32 AM

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
  • Likes: 4
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Awards
I don't think we really have to worry about who preached what and who said that.
Now you see me...now you don't...headshot